[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"blog_detail{\"slug\":[\"how-to-vet-a-blank-apparel-supplier-for-reorders\"]}":3},{"id":4,"path":5,"release_at":6,"seo_description":7,"classify":8,"title":12,"describe":13,"thumb":14,"detail":15,"usable":16,"recommend":17},199,"how-to-vet-a-blank-apparel-supplier-for-reorders","2026-10-01T11:12:56.000Z","Vet a blank apparel supplier for repeat orders using exact SKUs, approved samples, variant availability and a clear process for product changes.",{"id":9,"path":10,"name":11},4,"business-insights","Business Insights","How to Vet a Blank Apparel Supplier for Reorders","Check whether a supplier can repeat the blank you approved. Preserve product and sample references, verify variant availability, restrict substitutions and document differences before the next reorder.","upload\u002Fimage-1789880806589-1280x720.jpeg?alt=Man holding the sides of a plain grey T-shirt to show its drape","\u003Cp>Assess a blank apparel supplier against its ability to repeat the approved product across orders. Preserve the exact product identity, specification, measurements, color reference, and sample approval before placing an order. Without those records, a later shipment can look broadly familiar while leaving the buyer unable to establish what changed.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>For a POD brand or print shop, a blank is also the starting material for decoration. A change in fit, surface, composition, or construction may affect the finished product even when the replacement carries a similar name. Qualification therefore needs an agreed way to identify changes, review their consequences, and decide whether the next order can use the existing approval.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>What Identifies the Approved Blank?\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Record the supplier's exact product reference and the selected variant before evaluating repeatability. A descriptive name such as washed boxy tee is insufficient because it can apply to products with different materials and measurements. The buyer needs a reference that connects the product page, quotation, sample, purchase order, and receiving record.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.cloprod.com\u002Fblog\u002Frichtext-1789880806590-1100x720.jpeg?x-oss-process=image\u002Fresize,w_1100,h_720\" alt=\"Close-up of white T-shirt collar ribbing, stitching and shoulder fabric\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Start with the current product identifier, garment type, listed composition, weight, available color names, size range, and measurement chart. Preserve the dated specification used for approval, including any supplier clarification. A saved page is useful evidence of what the buyer saw, but ask which specification the supplier accepts as the order reference when public information is incomplete or ambiguous.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>For example, CLOPROD's \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cloprod.com\u002Fcatalog\u002Funisex\u002Ft-shirts\u002F285gsm-heavyweight-double-yarn-snow-wash-boxy-fit-t-shirt\" target=\"\">285GSM snow-wash boxy T-shirt\u003C\u002Fa> has a particular listed cotton composition, weight, silhouette, and size range. Those details identify a candidate to sample. They do not establish that another 285GSM cotton tee is interchangeable, or that every future order will match without a current specification and approval process.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cloprod.com\u002Fcatalog\u002Funisex\u002Fhoodies\u002F400gsm-unisex-washed-heavyweight-boxy-fit-hoodie\" target=\"\">400GSM washed boxy hoodie\u003C\u002Fa> has a listed composition of 42% cotton, 53% polyester, and 5% other fibers. Retain that information with its own measurements and variant references. A similar hoodie title or the same nominal weight cannot confirm the same blend, fit, construction, or decoration result.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Use stable internal naming without overwriting the supplier's terminology. If the brand calls a color faded black and the supplier uses a different name, keep both fields with an explicit mapping. Otherwise, a later buyer may request the internal name as though it were a recognized supplier variant and receive an interpretation instead of the intended product.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>Keep identity separate from description\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>The following record structure helps distinguish fields that identify the item from evidence used to approve it. Adapt the fields to the supplier's actual identifiers rather than inventing references it cannot recognize.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"width: auto;\">\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Record\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">What to preserve\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">What a mismatch requires\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Product identity\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Supplier product reference and current page\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Confirmation of whether this is the same item\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Variant identity\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Size, color name and internal mapping\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Review of the affected order allocation\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Specification\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Composition, weight, construction and measurements\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Product-specific change assessment\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Approval evidence\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Sample reference and review conditions\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Decision on whether new sampling is needed\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Order history\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">Quantity, receipt and accepted deviations\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colSpan=\"1\" rowSpan=\"1\" width=\"auto\">A traceable comparison with the next shipment\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>The record should let another buyer request the same product without guessing from photographs. It should also reveal when the supplier has proposed a different item, even if the alternative is described as equivalent. Similarity can justify reviewing a substitute; it cannot replace that review.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Where a channel requires GS1 identifiers, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fsupport.gs1.org\u002Fsupport\u002Fsolutions\u002Farticles\u002F43000734083-how-many-gs1-gtins-do-i-need-when-i-have-a-product-with-many-sizes-and-colours-\" target=\"\">GS1's guidance on size and color variants\u003C\u002Fa> distinguishes the identifiers needed for different variants. Keep any required GTIN mapped to the brand's SKU and supplier reference. These identifiers do not substitute for a specification or prove unchanged manufacturing conditions.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>What Does the Sample Actually Approve?\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Approve the sample against defined product requirements and preserve the conditions of that approval. A favorable first impression establishes little about which dimensions, fabric properties, color, or decoration result the buyer accepted. The record should explain what was checked, what remained uncertain, and which order configuration the sample represents.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.cloprod.com\u002Fblog\u002Frichtext-1789880806591-1100x720.jpeg?x-oss-process=image\u002Fresize,w_1100,h_720\" alt=\"White crewneck T-shirt showing sleeve length, torso fit and hem on a model\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Begin with measurement points and a consistent measuring method. Ask the supplier which chart and measurement definitions apply, then record the received sample against those references. A width measured at a different location or under different tension can create an apparent discrepancy that is difficult to interpret. Resolve the method before debating whether the garment is acceptable.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Review the intended fit on an appropriate wearer or fit reference, using the garment's actual measurements. Size names alone do not establish proportions. If the brand intends an oversized silhouette, distinguish deliberate ease from an unexpected measurement difference. Otherwise, the team may accept a sample because it looks relaxed without defining the shape it expects to reorder.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Color approval needs more than an uncontrolled phone photograph. Compare the sample under consistent viewing conditions and retain the physical reference where practical. For washed effects, ask what variation the supplier considers part of the product and what would require review. Do not invent a universal tolerance or assume that a deliberately variable finish permits any visible difference.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Document hand feel and construction observations in terms another reviewer can use. Instead of writing premium fabric, identify the surface, opacity, seam appearance, collar behavior, or other characteristic relevant to the product. Photographs can support that record, but they cannot fully communicate weight, feel, or the way the garment sits when worn.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>Test the intended decorated product\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>Review the blank with the decoration the brand plans to apply. Record the method, artwork version, placement, size, and any supplier-approved preparation. The sample may pass as an undecorated garment while leaving questions about the finished graphic. Keep blank approval and decoration approval distinct so neither is assumed from the other.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fcottonworks.com\u002Flearning-hub\u002Fquality-assurance\u002Fquality-testing\u002F\" target=\"\">CottonWorks' quality-testing overview\u003C\u002Fa> separates properties such as appearance, colorfastness, and dimensional stability. Use it as a general reference for asking product-specific questions, not as proof that a supplier's garment has passed a test. Request the relevant procedure and conditions when a performance statement affects the purchase decision.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Keep an undecorated reference where it is useful to distinguish a blank issue from a decoration issue. If a later printed garment looks different, the team needs to know whether the underlying blank changed, the print configuration changed, or both require investigation. A single decorated sample with no configuration record may not support that comparison.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Preserve the approved sample in an identifiable condition and distinguish it from samples used in care or destructive testing. A repeatedly washed reference may no longer represent the as-received appearance. Record its history so the next reviewer does not compare a new shipment with an altered sample and attribute every difference to the supplier.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Specify what reopens approval. A changed composition, measurement chart, color process, or relevant construction detail may require a new sample. A purely administrative description change may need confirmation rather than a full trial. Agree the review route with the supplier and keep the buyer responsible for deciding whether the evidence supports the intended product.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Can the Blank Apparel Supplier Replenish Exact Variants?\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Ask about availability at the exact size and color level and distinguish current stock from replenishment expectations. A supplier may continue listing the style while a required variant is unavailable. If the brand promises a consistent size range, that gap can affect the customer offer even when other variants remain plentiful.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.cloprod.com\u002Fblog\u002Frichtext-1789880806592-1100x720.jpeg?x-oss-process=image\u002Fresize,w_1100,h_720\" alt=\"Folded beige and dark T-shirts separated into stacks on wooden shelves\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Use the \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cloprod.com\u002Fcatalog\" target=\"\">current CLOPROD catalog\u003C\u002Fa> to locate candidates, then confirm the selected products for the planned order. A live listing establishes that the product is presented in the catalog; it does not guarantee the quantity, timing, or future availability the brand needs. Obtain order-specific confirmation before making a delivery promise based on the page.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Ask what the supplier means by restock lead time. It may refer to expected availability at a particular stage rather than arrival at the buyer's receiving location. Clarify the starting event, expected availability, dispatch conditions, and transport assumptions. Keep estimates labeled as estimates and identify which events can change them.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Discuss whether the desired stock is merely visible, available for allocation, or reserved against an accepted order. Those states can have different implications, and the supplier may not offer every arrangement. Do not assume that a quotation reserves stock or that a conversation about a future order prevents other customers from buying the same variants.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Provide a useful demand forecast without presenting it as a purchase commitment. Identify the core sizes and colors, expected ordering pattern, and any launch dependency. Ask what the supplier can realistically confirm in return. A forecast can support planning, but it should not be treated as an availability guarantee unless the parties have agreed the relevant terms.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>Plan for an unavailable variant\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>Define the permitted response before a shortage occurs. The buyer may accept a delay, reduce the allocation, split the shipment, or review a substitute. Each option needs a clear approval route. If the supplier is allowed to choose silently, the brand may discover the change only after decorating or listing the replacement stock.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>For a proposed substitute, request the exact product reference and the differences from the approved blank. Compare composition, measurements, color, construction, and supported decoration. Decide whether the item can serve the same customer expectation and whether it needs a separate listing. A phrase such as same quality does not answer those questions.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Keep the cost of continuity visible. Waiting may postpone a launch, splitting shipments may change logistics costs, and holding additional blanks uses cash and storage. Compare those consequences against the importance of the affected variant. There is no single stock policy that suits both a proven core garment and an experimental seasonal product.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Ask how discontinued or changing products are communicated. The supplier may have a formal notice process or a more limited practice. Record what it can provide and plan around that limitation. If continuity is central to the brand's offer, an inability to clarify product changes is a purchasing risk even when the current sample is acceptable.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>How Will Changes Reach the Buyer?\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Require a clear route for product changes and substitutions to reach an authorized buyer before they affect the order. Repeatability depends partly on whether the team learns about differences in time to evaluate them. An acceptable supplier relationship needs specific communication fields, not an assumption that familiar contacts will remember every prior approval.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Define the changes relevant to the blank. They can include composition, nominal weight, construction, measurement chart, color naming, finish, available sizes, or supported decoration areas. The supplier should know which details the brand relies on. Ask what it can notify and verify, and document any gaps instead of treating the requested process as an existing supplier capability.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.shopify.com\u002Fblog\u002Fsupplier-relationship-management\" target=\"\">Shopify supplier-relationship guide\u003C\u002Fa> discusses expectations, performance monitoring, and communication. Apply those principles to the specific blank and order. A general service rating is less useful here than a record showing whether the supplier identified a product change, explained the affected variants, and obtained the required approval.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Use a change record that names the old reference, proposed reference, affected orders, reason, evidence, and decision. Include the person authorized to accept the change. Keep open requests distinct from approved changes so a suggestion made during a sourcing discussion cannot become an instruction simply because it appears in the same message thread.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>Make substitution permission narrow\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>If the brand permits any substitutions, define the boundary explicitly. Permission to use an alternative carton should not imply permission to change the garment. Permission to adjust a quantity should not imply acceptance of a different size. Connect every permitted change to its specific field and preserve the rest of the approved specification.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>When a change could affect decoration, send it to the person responsible for the finished-product review. Purchasing may understand the commercial consequence without being able to judge print compatibility or placement. The decision needs the relevant evidence and reviewer before the replacement enters the production flow, not an explanation after the artwork has been applied.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Confirm which version the supplier will use after a change is approved. An accepted revised chart or product reference should replace the previous active instruction for the affected order. Keep the earlier version as history, but remove ambiguity about what is current. Ask for acknowledgment against the order reference rather than relying on a general reply that the message was received.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Also examine the buyer's own changes. A revised artwork, different care instruction, or new measurement expectation can make an otherwise unchanged blank appear inconsistent with the prior order. Date and version those decisions alongside supplier changes. A fair investigation needs to distinguish a supplier deviation from a requirement that the brand changed after the original approval.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Agree how unresolved differences affect release. The supplier should know whether to hold the affected units, proceed with unaffected variants, or await a complete order decision. Ask about the schedule and cost implications of that approach. A hold instruction without defined scope can delay usable stock or allow disputed items to move because responsibility remains unclear.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>What Should the Reorder Record Prove?\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The reorder record should show what was ordered, what arrived, how it compared with the approved reference, and which differences were accepted. It is the evidence needed to assess repeatability over time. A sequence of paid invoices proves purchasing activity, but provides little detail about whether the same usable blank was delivered.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.cloprod.com\u002Fblog\u002Frichtext-1789880806593-1100x720.jpeg?x-oss-process=image\u002Fresize,w_1100,h_720\" alt=\"Two men wearing plain white T-shirts with different visible sleeve and hem profiles\" data-href=\"\" style=\"\"\u002F>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>At receipt, preserve the order, shipment, and available batch references before stock is mixed. Use the supplier's real identifiers rather than inventing a batch label that implies traceability the supplier cannot support. Keep affected variants identifiable while discrepancies are reviewed, particularly if decoration will make returning or replacing the blank more complicated.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Compare the received garments with the current specification and sample using the agreed methods. Record the specific measurement, color, construction, or surface difference and the conditions of observation. A complaint that the fabric feels worse is difficult to investigate without a reference and description. Ask for an explanation before attributing the difference to a particular manufacturing cause.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>When assessing wholesale blank apparel suppliers, retain both acceptable and disputed receipt records. Recording only failures leaves the team without a comparison for normal deliveries. Include the exact affected sizes and colors when a discrepancy is found; an issue limited to one variant should not automatically be described as a change to the entire style. Conversely, separate orders with the same recurring discrepancy deserve review together. Ask whether their available production references reveal a connection, and keep the cause unresolved when those records cannot establish one. Preserve the corresponding supplier responses.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>Separate causes from symptoms\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>For a decoration problem, retain evidence of the blank and the applied process. Identify whether the garment reference, artwork, placement, method, or preparation differs from the approved configuration. Avoid concluding that a fabric change caused the result until the relevant variables have been checked. The practical response may require both the blank supplier and the decoration team to review their records.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Keep corrections linked to the affected units and the next order. A replacement shipment resolves an immediate shortage only if the replacement is checked. Record what the supplier changed, what the buyer accepted, and whether a later reorder repeated the issue. Do not describe a corrective action as effective merely because the supplier proposed it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Review performance by exact product as well as by supplier. A source may repeat one blank satisfactorily while another product has unresolved availability or specification issues. A company-wide impression can hide that difference. Where possible, limit the next commitment to the products and variants with evidence that supports the planned use.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>For broader questions about service, fulfillment, or overall business suitability, use the \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cloprod.com\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-to-vet-a-print-on-demand-streetwear-supplier\" target=\"\">POD streetwear supplier qualification guide\u003C\u002Fa>. Keep the blank-specific decision grounded in product identity, repeated deliveries, and change handling. Passing a general checklist cannot replace evidence that the selected garment remains suitable for the next order.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Before releasing a reorder, send the prior product and approval references with the current allocation and requested delivery date. Ask the supplier to confirm availability and identify any changes. Resolve exceptions before payment or production reaches the agreed commitment point. The order should state the intended product clearly enough that both teams can recognize an unauthorized substitution.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Conclusion\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Build a product-specific evidence file before relying on a blank for repeat sales. Preserve the supplier reference, variant mapping, specification, measurement method, and approved sample. Record decoration conditions separately and agree how changes, shortages, and proposed substitutes will be reviewed. Check repeat deliveries against those references before treating the first sample as proof of ongoing consistency.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Send the exact garment references, quantities, size and color allocation, intended decoration, and target delivery date to \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cloprod.com\u002Fterms\u002Fcontact-us\" target=\"\">CLOPROD's apparel team\u003C\u002Fa>. Request current specifications and availability, then identify any detail that needs fresh sample approval. Keep the reply with the purchase record. After receipt, document what matched, what differed, and what was accepted so the following reorder begins with evidence rather than a remembered impression.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>FAQ\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3>Does one approved sample prove repeatability?\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>No. Compare later deliveries with the approved specification and current references.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>Can a supplier replace an unavailable blank?\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>Only within agreed permission; review product and decoration differences before acceptance.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>Is the same color name sufficient?\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>No. Preserve the exact variant and compare with the approved physical reference.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3>What should trigger a new sample?\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp>Changes affecting the approved fit, fabric, appearance, or decoration need review.\u003C\u002Fp>",true,[18,25,32],{"id":19,"path":20,"release_at":21,"title":22,"describe":23,"thumb":24},65,"guide-to-breathable-fabrics-for-summer-custom-apparel","2026-05-14T02:32:13.186Z","Guide to Breathable Fabrics for Summer Custom Apparel","Practical factory-perspective guidance for brand founders and procurement teams sourcing breathable t shirts and lightweight summer apparel. Covers breathability vs moisture wicking, AATCC TM217 testing, cotton vs polyester selection, printing impact on airflow, and MOQ plus lead time planning for bulk summer programs.","upload\u002Fimage-1778825664152-1280x720.jpeg",{"id":26,"path":27,"release_at":28,"title":29,"describe":30,"thumb":31},40,"is-cloprod-better-than-printify-for-fashion-brands","2026-04-09T03:38:32.095Z","Is Cloprod Better Than Printify for Fashion Brands","This article compares Cloprod and Printify from a B2B apparel brand perspective, covering branding options, cost structure, print-process fit, sampling, fulfillment, Shopify and Etsy workflows, and which platform works best from product testing to repeat orders.","upload\u002Fimage-1777002556632-1280x720.jpeg",{"id":33,"path":34,"release_at":35,"title":36,"describe":37,"thumb":38},66,"custom-tank-tops-vs-t-shirts-for-summer-campaign-roi","2026-05-14T06:23:51.937Z","Custom Tank Tops vs T-Shirts for Summer Campaign ROI","A B2B factory-perspective breakdown of how brands, ecommerce sellers, and procurement teams should choose between custom tank tops and custom T-shirts for summer campaigns, covering ROI, fabric, print methods, MOQ, lead time, and total cost.","upload\u002Fimage-1778829984924-1280x720.jpeg"]